Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Literature Response 2


1. Response to the Readings

The article by Fisher, Frey & Lapp 2012, proved to be quite informative and useful. Fisher et al., provide great insight in, Shared Readings: Modeling Comprehension, Vocabulary, Text Structures, and Text Features for Older Readers. The multiple examples offered throughout the article are wonderful for any teacher to understand effective ways to support student literacy through modeling and strategies. I related to many of these teacher’s teaching styles as they emulate my own.  I am glad I came across this article as it helped in reaffirming all the teaching methods I try to include in my own lesson’s.


The next article I found interesting is, Intensive Word Study and Repeated Reading Improves Reading for Two Students with Learning Disabilities by Staudt (2009). Although Staudt (2009), focused on students with learning disabilities, it left me wondering if these very same strategies wouldn’t work with other struggling readers. An example being using timed repeated reading as a motivational device (p.143). I also liked how the author further encouraged the students by suggesting they set goals. I also thought it was great how the author used poems to make the readings more engaging for the students and so they could have exposure to how language works in different forms.


2. Personal Connection

 Another article I found to be very useful is, Sytgles (2011) Implementing morphological word study in the intermediate classroom. The article came at the perfect time for me as I recently got hired for a 6th grade ELAR teaching position. It is my intent to consider implementing word work in my classroom instruction. As stated by Sytgles (2011), “morphological word study is necessary and essential” (p.65).  In agreement with Sytgles,” the more students handle roots, bases, and affixes, the higher their reading achievement” (p.65). The position will require me to work with multiple English Language Learners and after reading the article, I feel confident in trying out these suggested practices in my own classroom.


3. Critiques

What are specific informal assessments that you found useful in this past week?

I found a number of informal assessments to be useful, to include: cloze test, Informal Reading Inventories (IRIs), and running records. As reported by Rubin, In Organizing and Evaluating Results these specific tests offer teachers greater control over the type of text they can use to, as well as the control to design questions to help determine the varying levels of comprehension.


Which ones would you recommend for vocabulary, comprehension and writing?

In agreement with Rubin (2011), “the cloze test has been recommended for supporting readers who struggle with comprehension and vocabulary” (p.606). Rubin (2011) also states, “Informal Reading Inventories (IRIs) focus on evaluating comprehension…and running records are widely used for assessing reading progress” (p.607).

As discussed in our synchronized session, I found the 6+1 Trait Writing to be very informative and useful for assessing student writing and providing positive and clear student feedback.  I can’t wait to implement this assessment as a device to help in student writing.